COUNTRY EVIDENCE FILE
KORU / WHO IS WATCHING? · PILOT 1.9

COUNTRY PROFILE · SOUTH ASIA

PakistanEvidence file

A readable record of documented public CCTV, AI scope, facial recognition, private-camera links, safeguards, and the jurisdictional conditions around where data may be hosted. It is not a surveillance score.

REFERENCE PLACELahore
LAST SOURCE VINTAGECCTV source updated 25 Jun 2025; WJP score 2025
PRIVACY RIGHTS15.8 / 100

THE EVIDENCE STACK

Seven records
Different claims

Every measure has its own source, date, and scope. The country profile keeps them distinct by design.

01
CCTV REFERENCE EVIDENCE

27.67 cameras / 1k

410,297 reported cameras in Lahore. The study notes that 400,000 mapped private cameras are included in Lahore’s figure.

Open CCTV source
FACE / BIOMETRIC

Documented active use

Safe City networks in major cities · 2016–2025
Public reporting describes facial-recognition capability in Safe City networks, but the first extension does not calculate a national deployment intensity.

Biometric Update · 2016
AI USE SCOPE

Facial identification

2024-02 · Medium confidence
Public reporting describes AI-powered criminal identification in Safe City contexts. The pilot does not convert this into a national intensity measure.

SETTING
Live public space
DECISION ROLE
Unknown
SCALE
Multi-city or agency programme
SAFEGUARDS
No clear public detail

Evidence is centred on provincial and city Safe City programmes; public detail on operational decision-making is limited.

Biometric Update · AI identification
PRIVATE-CAMERA LINK

Documented networked camera ecosystem

Punjab / Lahore · 2025-07
Associated Press of Pakistan reports a PSCA process linking owner-authorised business cameras to its Safe City network; it does not prove routine access to every private feed.

Associated Press of Pakistan · 2025
SAFEGUARDS CONTEXT

15.8 / 100

WJP 2025 Factor 4.6: protection from arbitrary interference with privacy in practice. The score changed -4.2 points from 2024.

Open WJP source
SUPPLIER / PROCUREMENT

Documented record

Huawei
Punjab Safe Cities equipment agreement for CCTV cameras, vehicle-mounted cameras, and a command-and-control system.

PUBLIC BODY
Provincial government / Punjab Safe Cities project
SCOPE
Lahore first phase; not a nationwide supplier map.
RECORD TYPE
Qualified investigative / ethics record
EVIDENCE DATE
2016-05

This is an older journalistic record of a named agreement; it does not establish the current configuration or later provincial deployments.

The Express Tribune — Safe Cities equipment agreement
INCIDENTS & REDRESS

Evidence gap

Review completed 2026-08 · Pilot evidence review
No incident record published in this pilot release

The first review did not locate a sufficiently accessible, surveillance-specific incident record that meets the Editorial & Evidence Protocol’s publication threshold.

Initial candidates require a more accessible primary judicial or inquiry record and a tighter surveillance-specific scope before publication.

No comparable public source located in this reviewOpen incidents & redress

DATA INFRASTRUCTURE & JURISDICTION

Where data may sit, and what can govern it

These are separate contextual records. Data-centre capacity is not evidence of surveillance access; legal powers are not evidence of their use.

CONTEXT, NOT PROOF

Some national policy instruments are draft, pending, or sector-specific, limiting cross-country comparability.

Medium confidence
DATA-CENTRE CONTEXT

Government data-centre context

2022–2026
Cloud First policy material and National Telecommunication Corporation information describe government cloud and Tier III facilities; no comparable nationwide facility total is used.

Pakistan Cloud First Policy
DATA RESIDENCY

Sensitive government-data policy

2022
Cloud First policy distinguishes secret and sensitive government information; wider personal-data legislation remains in flux.

Pakistan Cloud First Policy
PUBLIC-SECTOR CLOUD

Government cloud framework

2022
The published Cloud First policy sets a government-cloud direction and identifies NTC G-Cloud as part of the environment.

Pakistan Cloud First Policy
LAWFUL-ACCESS CONTEXT

Provider-disclosure powers

2016
PECA and related material provide a public legal basis for specified investigative disclosure. This does not evidence actual access to a named provider.

Pakistan Code · PECA 2016

SOURCE HISTORY

When the record changed.

The timeline preserves source vintages and review dates so changes can be examined rather than announced without a record.

  1. 2024
    Safeguards baseline

    WJP privacy-rights score: 20.0 / 100.

    Open source
  2. 2025-06
    CCTV evidence source

    Lahore: 410,297 reported cameras; 27.67 per 1,000 people in the documented reference place.

    Open source
  3. 2025
    Safeguards update

    WJP privacy-rights score: 15.8 / 100 (-4.2 points year on year).

    Open source
  4. 2016–2025
    Facial-recognition record

    Public reporting describes facial-recognition capability in Safe City networks, but the first extension does not calculate a national deployment intensity.

    Open source
  5. 2025-07
    Camera-integration record

    Associated Press of Pakistan reports a PSCA process linking owner-authorised business cameras to its Safe City network; it does not prove routine access to every private feed.

    Open source
  6. 2024-02
    AI use-scope record

    Facial identification · Live public space · Unknown. Public reporting describes AI-powered criminal identification in Safe City contexts. The pilot does not convert this into a national intensity measure.

    Open source
  7. 2016-05
    Supplier / procurement record

    Punjab Safe Cities equipment agreement for CCTV cameras, vehicle-mounted cameras, and a command-and-control system.

    Open source
  8. 2022–2026
    Data-infrastructure context

    Cloud First policy material and National Telecommunication Corporation information describe government cloud and Tier III facilities; no comparable nationwide facility total is used.

    Open source
  9. 2016
    Lawful-access context

    PECA and related material provide a public legal basis for specified investigative disclosure. This does not evidence actual access to a named provider.

    Open source
  10. Review completed 2026-08
    Incident / redress record

    Evidence gap: The first review did not locate a sufficiently accessible, surveillance-specific incident record that meets the Editorial & Evidence Protocol’s publication threshold.

    No comparable public source located in this review
  11. 2026-08
    Layer evidence review

    Record category: Paired layer record. This version preserves gaps rather than treating them as evidence of absence.

    No comparable public source located in this review

REVIEWED PUBLIC UPDATES

Accepted additions and corrections.

Community submissions remain private until an editor checks the source, scope, and status. Only accepted changes appear here.

Loading reviewed updates…