27.67 cameras / 1k
410,297 reported cameras in Lahore. The study notes that 400,000 mapped private cameras are included in Lahore’s figure.
Open CCTV sourceCOUNTRY PROFILE · SOUTH ASIA
A readable record of documented public CCTV, AI scope, facial recognition, private-camera links, safeguards, and the jurisdictional conditions around where data may be hosted. It is not a surveillance score.
THE EVIDENCE STACK
Every measure has its own source, date, and scope. The country profile keeps them distinct by design.
410,297 reported cameras in Lahore. The study notes that 400,000 mapped private cameras are included in Lahore’s figure.
Open CCTV sourceSafe City networks in major cities · 2016–2025
Public reporting describes facial-recognition capability in Safe City networks, but the first extension does not calculate a national deployment intensity.
2024-02 · Medium confidence
Public reporting describes AI-powered criminal identification in Safe City contexts. The pilot does not convert this into a national intensity measure.
Evidence is centred on provincial and city Safe City programmes; public detail on operational decision-making is limited.
Biometric Update · AI identificationPunjab / Lahore · 2025-07
Associated Press of Pakistan reports a PSCA process linking owner-authorised business cameras to its Safe City network; it does not prove routine access to every private feed.
WJP 2025 Factor 4.6: protection from arbitrary interference with privacy in practice. The score changed -4.2 points from 2024.
Open WJP sourceHuawei
Punjab Safe Cities equipment agreement for CCTV cameras, vehicle-mounted cameras, and a command-and-control system.
This is an older journalistic record of a named agreement; it does not establish the current configuration or later provincial deployments.
The Express Tribune — Safe Cities equipment agreementReview completed 2026-08 · Pilot evidence review
No incident record published in this pilot release
The first review did not locate a sufficiently accessible, surveillance-specific incident record that meets the Editorial & Evidence Protocol’s publication threshold.
Initial candidates require a more accessible primary judicial or inquiry record and a tighter surveillance-specific scope before publication.
No comparable public source located in this reviewOpen incidents & redressDATA INFRASTRUCTURE & JURISDICTION
These are separate contextual records. Data-centre capacity is not evidence of surveillance access; legal powers are not evidence of their use.
Some national policy instruments are draft, pending, or sector-specific, limiting cross-country comparability.
Medium confidence2022–2026
Cloud First policy material and National Telecommunication Corporation information describe government cloud and Tier III facilities; no comparable nationwide facility total is used.
2022
Cloud First policy distinguishes secret and sensitive government information; wider personal-data legislation remains in flux.
2022
The published Cloud First policy sets a government-cloud direction and identifies NTC G-Cloud as part of the environment.
2016
PECA and related material provide a public legal basis for specified investigative disclosure. This does not evidence actual access to a named provider.
SOURCE HISTORY
The timeline preserves source vintages and review dates so changes can be examined rather than announced without a record.
Lahore: 410,297 reported cameras; 27.67 per 1,000 people in the documented reference place.
Open sourcePublic reporting describes facial-recognition capability in Safe City networks, but the first extension does not calculate a national deployment intensity.
Open sourceAssociated Press of Pakistan reports a PSCA process linking owner-authorised business cameras to its Safe City network; it does not prove routine access to every private feed.
Open sourceFacial identification · Live public space · Unknown. Public reporting describes AI-powered criminal identification in Safe City contexts. The pilot does not convert this into a national intensity measure.
Open sourcePunjab Safe Cities equipment agreement for CCTV cameras, vehicle-mounted cameras, and a command-and-control system.
Open sourceCloud First policy material and National Telecommunication Corporation information describe government cloud and Tier III facilities; no comparable nationwide facility total is used.
Open sourcePECA and related material provide a public legal basis for specified investigative disclosure. This does not evidence actual access to a named provider.
Open sourceEvidence gap: The first review did not locate a sufficiently accessible, surveillance-specific incident record that meets the Editorial & Evidence Protocol’s publication threshold.
No comparable public source located in this reviewRecord category: Paired layer record. This version preserves gaps rather than treating them as evidence of absence.
No comparable public source located in this reviewREVIEWED PUBLIC UPDATES
Community submissions remain private until an editor checks the source, scope, and status. Only accepted changes appear here.
Loading reviewed updates…