COUNTRY EVIDENCE FILE
KORU / WHO IS WATCHING? · PILOT 1.9

COUNTRY PROFILE · EAST ASIA & PACIFIC

ChinaEvidence file

A readable record of documented public CCTV, AI scope, facial recognition, private-camera links, safeguards, and the jurisdictional conditions around where data may be hosted. It is not a surveillance score.

REFERENCE PLACENational estimate
LAST SOURCE VINTAGECCTV source updated 25 Jun 2025; WJP score 2025
PRIVACY RIGHTS9.7 / 100

THE EVIDENCE STACK

Seven records
Different claims

Every measure has its own source, date, and scope. The country profile keeps them distinct by design.

01
CCTV REFERENCE EVIDENCE

494.25 cameras / 1k

700,000,000 reported cameras in National estimate. Comparitech applies this country-wide estimate to Chinese-city comparisons; it is not an independently audited national register.

Open CCTV source
FACE / BIOMETRIC

Documented active use

National programme evidence · 2021
CSET identifies SkyNet as a camera programme connected to facial-recognition algorithms; China’s wider camera ecosystem is not treated here as a comparable intensity score.

CSET · 2021
AI USE SCOPE

Facial identification

2021 · Medium confidence
CSET describes camera programmes including SkyNet, connected to facial-recognition algorithms, within China’s broader public-space monitoring ecosystem.

SETTING
Live public space
DECISION ROLE
Automated alert
SCALE
National programme context
SAFEGUARDS
No clear public detail

National programme context does not establish uniform local implementation, alert rules, or technical performance.

CSET · Sharp Eyes programme
PRIVATE-CAMERA LINK

Documented networked camera ecosystem

National programme evidence · 2021
CSET describes overlapping surveillance programmes involving public and private security cameras. The source does not establish police access to every private feed.

CSET · 2021
SAFEGUARDS CONTEXT

9.7 / 100

WJP 2025 Factor 4.6: protection from arbitrary interference with privacy in practice. The score changed +0.0 points from 2024.

Open WJP source
SUPPLIER / PROCUREMENT

Documented record

Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co Ltd
Named Xinjiang public-private partnerships for surveillance-system production, installation, operation, and maintenance.

PUBLIC BODY
Authorities in Xinjiang; named projects include Moyu County, Hotan Prefecture, and Urumqi.
SCOPE
Named regional projects; not a national procurement finding.
RECORD TYPE
Qualified investigative / ethics record
EVIDENCE DATE
2020-01

The published assessment draws on company reports and procurement material, including material no longer public; it must not be generalised to all of China.

Norwegian Council on Ethics — Hikvision recommendation
INCIDENTS & REDRESS

Official finding

21 Jul 2022 · China · DiDi Global Inc. domestic services
CAC administrative punishment of DiDi

The Cyberspace Administration of China found unlawful collection and handling of personal information, including passenger facial-recognition data, and imposed an administrative fine.

This is a commercial-platform data-protection finding, not evidence about every public surveillance system in China.

DigiChina / Stanford Cyber Policy Center · CAC translation Open incidents & redress

DATA INFRASTRUCTURE & JURISDICTION

Where data may sit, and what can govern it

These are separate contextual records. Data-centre capacity is not evidence of surveillance access; legal powers are not evidence of their use.

CONTEXT, NOT PROOF

Policy and statutory material do not show where a named CCTV or biometric dataset is hosted or who accesses it in practice.

Medium confidence
DATA-CENTRE CONTEXT

National infrastructure policy

2024
A draft guideline aims to complete national data infrastructure by 2029. It is policy context, not a facility inventory or an authority-access claim.

National Data Administration report · 2024
DATA RESIDENCY

Defined-data localisation rule

2017–2021
Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws provide localisation rules for critical information infrastructure and defined important data; implementation scope remains administrative and evolving.

Cybersecurity Law translation
LAWFUL-ACCESS CONTEXT

Provider-assistance powers in statute

2018
National Intelligence Law provisions are cited as requiring relevant organisations to support intelligence work. This does not establish routine access to a particular dataset.

China Law Translate · National Intelligence Law

SOURCE HISTORY

When the record changed.

The timeline preserves source vintages and review dates so changes can be examined rather than announced without a record.

  1. 2024
    Safeguards baseline

    WJP privacy-rights score: 9.7 / 100.

    Open source
  2. 2025-06
    CCTV evidence source

    National estimate: 700,000,000 reported cameras; 494.25 per 1,000 people in the documented reference place.

    Open source
  3. 2025
    Safeguards update

    WJP privacy-rights score: 9.7 / 100 (+0.0 points year on year).

    Open source
  4. 2021
    Facial-recognition record

    CSET identifies SkyNet as a camera programme connected to facial-recognition algorithms; China’s wider camera ecosystem is not treated here as a comparable intensity score.

    Open source
  5. 2021
    Camera-integration record

    CSET describes overlapping surveillance programmes involving public and private security cameras. The source does not establish police access to every private feed.

    Open source
  6. 2021
    AI use-scope record

    Facial identification · Live public space · Automated alert. CSET describes camera programmes including SkyNet, connected to facial-recognition algorithms, within China’s broader public-space monitoring ecosystem.

    Open source
  7. 2020-01
    Supplier / procurement record

    Named Xinjiang public-private partnerships for surveillance-system production, installation, operation, and maintenance.

    Open source
  8. 2024
    Data-infrastructure context

    A draft guideline aims to complete national data infrastructure by 2029. It is policy context, not a facility inventory or an authority-access claim.

    Open source
  9. 2018
    Lawful-access context

    National Intelligence Law provisions are cited as requiring relevant organisations to support intelligence work. This does not establish routine access to a particular dataset.

    Open source
  10. 21 Jul 2022
    Incident / redress record

    Official finding: The Cyberspace Administration of China found unlawful collection and handling of personal information, including passenger facial-recognition data, and imposed an administrative fine.

    Open source
  11. 2026-08
    Layer evidence review

    Record category: Major evidence gaps. This version preserves gaps rather than treating them as evidence of absence.

    No comparable public source located in this review

REVIEWED PUBLIC UPDATES

Accepted additions and corrections.

Community submissions remain private until an editor checks the source, scope, and status. Only accepted changes appear here.

Loading reviewed updates…