COUNTRY EVIDENCE FILE
KORU / WHO IS WATCHING? · PILOT 1.9

COUNTRY PROFILE · LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN

BrazilEvidence file

A readable record of documented public CCTV, AI scope, facial recognition, private-camera links, safeguards, and the jurisdictional conditions around where data may be hosted. It is not a surveillance score.

REFERENCE PLACESão Paulo
LAST SOURCE VINTAGECCTV source updated 25 Jun 2025; WJP score 2025
PRIVACY RIGHTS59.0 / 100

THE EVIDENCE STACK

Seven records
Different claims

Every measure has its own source, date, and scope. The country profile keeps them distinct by design.

01
CCTV REFERENCE EVIDENCE

2.23 cameras / 1k

51,346 reported cameras in São Paulo. Reference-city evidence only; national scope is not inferred.

Open CCTV source
FACE / BIOMETRIC

Documented active use

São Paulo Smart Sampa · 2026
The official São Paulo Smart Sampa site states that smart cameras use facial recognition to identify wanted and missing people and support urban-safety cases.

Prefeitura de São Paulo
AI USE SCOPE

Facial identification

2026 · High confidence
São Paulo’s Smart Sampa portal describes smart cameras using facial recognition to identify wanted and missing people in city public-safety operations.

SETTING
Live public space
DECISION ROLE
Automated alert
SCALE
Named local operation
SAFEGUARDS
No clear public detail

The source is city-specific and does not demonstrate a Brazilian national operational model or independent safeguard assessment.

Prefeitura de São Paulo · Smart Sampa
PRIVATE-CAMERA LINK

Documented networked camera ecosystem

São Paulo Smart Sampa · 2026
The same official portal invites condominium and business owners to integrate cameras into Smart Sampa through a dedicated portal. The record remains city-specific.

Prefeitura de São Paulo
SAFEGUARDS CONTEXT

59.0 / 100

WJP 2025 Factor 4.6: protection from arbitrary interference with privacy in practice. The score changed +2.4 points from 2024.

Open WJP source
SUPPLIER / PROCUREMENT

Evidence gap retained

Not documented in this release
No attributed supplier, public body, and surveillance-relevant system chain was verified for this pilot record.

PUBLIC BODY
Brazil
SCOPE
Country evidence file
RECORD TYPE
No comparable record
EVIDENCE DATE
2026-08

An evidence gap is not a finding that no supplier, contract, or public procurement exists.

No comparable public source located in this review
INCIDENTS & REDRESS

Official finding

09 May 2022 · São Paulo · metro network
São Paulo Metro facial-recognition injunction

A judge in São Paulo ruled that the city metro must stop using facial-recognition technology on its network in the reported case brought by civil-society and public-defender organisations.

The record is limited to the described metro system and reported injunction; later procedural developments require separate review.

ARTICLE 19 · Brazil and South America Open incidents & redress

DATA INFRASTRUCTURE & JURISDICTION

Where data may sit, and what can govern it

These are separate contextual records. Data-centre capacity is not evidence of surveillance access; legal powers are not evidence of their use.

CONTEXT, NOT PROOF

Government cloud policy does not establish where municipal or police surveillance systems are hosted, and legal access depends on procedure.

High confidence
DATA-CENTRE CONTEXT

National data-infrastructure policy

2024–2025
Federal measures establish a National Data Infrastructure direction and later capacity-incentive policy. No comparable facility total is used.

Planalto · Decree 12.198/2024
DATA RESIDENCY

Safeguarded transfer framework

2024
LGPD governs international transfers, including safeguards and standard clauses. This is not a general local-storage mandate.

Planalto · LGPD
PUBLIC-SECTOR CLOUD

Government cloud arrangements

2024
Government describes a Nuvem de Governo managed by public bodies or companies, with 2024 cooperation agreements involving SERPRO and DATAPREV.

Government of Brazil · Nuvem de Governo
LAWFUL-ACCESS CONTEXT

Judicial disclosure rule

2014
Marco Civil provides for disclosure of connection and application records on judicial order. This is a legal safeguard and access-context record.

Planalto · Marco Civil

SOURCE HISTORY

When the record changed.

The timeline preserves source vintages and review dates so changes can be examined rather than announced without a record.

  1. 2024
    Safeguards baseline

    WJP privacy-rights score: 56.6 / 100.

    Open source
  2. 2025-06
    CCTV evidence source

    São Paulo: 51,346 reported cameras; 2.23 per 1,000 people in the documented reference place.

    Open source
  3. 2025
    Safeguards update

    WJP privacy-rights score: 59.0 / 100 (+2.4 points year on year).

    Open source
  4. 2026
    Facial-recognition record

    The official São Paulo Smart Sampa site states that smart cameras use facial recognition to identify wanted and missing people and support urban-safety cases.

    Open source
  5. 2026
    Camera-integration record

    The same official portal invites condominium and business owners to integrate cameras into Smart Sampa through a dedicated portal. The record remains city-specific.

    Open source
  6. 2026
    AI use-scope record

    Facial identification · Live public space · Automated alert. São Paulo’s Smart Sampa portal describes smart cameras using facial recognition to identify wanted and missing people in city public-safety operations.

    Open source
  7. 2026-08
    Supplier / procurement record

    No attributed supplier, public body, and surveillance-relevant system chain was verified for this pilot record.

    No comparable public source located in this review
  8. 2024–2025
    Data-infrastructure context

    Federal measures establish a National Data Infrastructure direction and later capacity-incentive policy. No comparable facility total is used.

    Open source
  9. 2014
    Lawful-access context

    Marco Civil provides for disclosure of connection and application records on judicial order. This is a legal safeguard and access-context record.

    Open source
  10. 09 May 2022
    Incident / redress record

    Official finding: A judge in São Paulo ruled that the city metro must stop using facial-recognition technology on its network in the reported case brought by civil-society and public-defender organisations.

    Open source
  11. 2026-08
    Layer evidence review

    Record category: Paired layer record. This version preserves gaps rather than treating them as evidence of absence.

    No comparable public source located in this review

REVIEWED PUBLIC UPDATES

Accepted additions and corrections.

Community submissions remain private until an editor checks the source, scope, and status. Only accepted changes appear here.

Loading reviewed updates…