0.14 cameras / 1k
3,512 reported cameras in Dhaka. A low published figure does not establish low surveillance capacity; this is a documented-data point, not a negative finding.
Open CCTV sourceCOUNTRY PROFILE · SOUTH ASIA
A readable record of documented public CCTV, AI scope, facial recognition, private-camera links, safeguards, and the jurisdictional conditions around where data may be hosted. It is not a surveillance score.
THE EVIDENCE STACK
Every measure has its own source, date, and scope. The country profile keeps them distinct by design.
3,512 reported cameras in Dhaka. A low published figure does not establish low surveillance capacity; this is a documented-data point, not a negative finding.
Open CCTV sourcePilot evidence review · 2026-08
The review surfaced claims about planned or emerging AI camera projects but did not validate a public, accessible source adequate to assign an operational facial-recognition status. This is an evidence gap, not a negative finding.
2026-04 · Medium confidence
State news reporting describes an AI traffic-enforcement system within a wider police digital-platform launch.
The source concerns traffic enforcement and does not establish public facial recognition or a national AI-surveillance programme.
Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha · DMPPilot evidence review · 2026-08
The review did not validate a comparable public source describing a camera registry, footage-request process, or direct access arrangement. The gap is reported explicitly.
WJP 2025 Factor 4.6: protection from arbitrary interference with privacy in practice. The score changed +1.8 points from 2024.
Open WJP sourceNot documented in this release
No attributed supplier, public body, and surveillance-relevant system chain was verified for this pilot record.
An evidence gap is not a finding that no supplier, contract, or public procurement exists.
No comparable public source located in this reviewReview completed 2026-08 · Pilot evidence review
No incident record published in this pilot release
The first review did not locate a sufficiently accessible, surveillance-specific incident record that meets the Editorial & Evidence Protocol’s publication threshold.
The first-pass national-ID exposure candidate needs an accessible, attributable source beyond the initial summary before an incident record can be published.
No comparable public source located in this reviewOpen incidents & redressDATA INFRASTRUCTURE & JURISDICTION
These are separate contextual records. Data-centre capacity is not evidence of surveillance access; legal powers are not evidence of their use.
Newer personal-data rules require further validation as implementation guidance develops; infrastructure sources do not link hosting to surveillance systems.
Medium confidence2026
The Bangladesh Computer Council’s National Data Center advertises cloud, VPS, hosting, colocation, and application-hosting services. No national facility count is used.
2026
A public legal overview describes new rules for defined public restricted personal data and cross-border transfers; implementation details need continuing review.
2026
The National Data Center advertises government and non-government cloud services, but does not establish which public systems use them.
2023
Civil-society analysis describes Cyber Security Act and telecom disclosure/interception powers. The record is legal context, not evidence of a specific request.
SOURCE HISTORY
The timeline preserves source vintages and review dates so changes can be examined rather than announced without a record.
Dhaka: 3,512 reported cameras; 0.14 per 1,000 people in the documented reference place.
Open sourceThe review surfaced claims about planned or emerging AI camera projects but did not validate a public, accessible source adequate to assign an operational facial-recognition status. This is an evidence gap, not a negative finding.
No comparable public source located in this reviewThe review did not validate a comparable public source describing a camera registry, footage-request process, or direct access arrangement. The gap is reported explicitly.
No comparable public source located in this reviewVehicle or licence-plate recognition · Live public space · Enforcement support. State news reporting describes an AI traffic-enforcement system within a wider police digital-platform launch.
Open sourceNo attributed supplier, public body, and surveillance-relevant system chain was verified for this pilot record.
No comparable public source located in this reviewThe Bangladesh Computer Council’s National Data Center advertises cloud, VPS, hosting, colocation, and application-hosting services. No national facility count is used.
Open sourceCivil-society analysis describes Cyber Security Act and telecom disclosure/interception powers. The record is legal context, not evidence of a specific request.
Open sourceEvidence gap: The first review did not locate a sufficiently accessible, surveillance-specific incident record that meets the Editorial & Evidence Protocol’s publication threshold.
No comparable public source located in this reviewRecord category: Major evidence gaps. This version preserves gaps rather than treating them as evidence of absence.
No comparable public source located in this reviewREVIEWED PUBLIC UPDATES
Community submissions remain private until an editor checks the source, scope, and status. Only accepted changes appear here.
Loading reviewed updates…